


There’s an interesting op/ed in the Boston Globe today about the media’s bias against Hillary Clinton. The author is right in many ways: the presidential race has been distracted at times by reports of her cackling (like a witch?), her bustline and whether she’s dumb to stand by philandering Bill (isn’t that ancient history by now?).
But – and this isn’t because it was written by a man – the underlying theme is that young women of today aren’t supporting Hillary Clinton because they don’t remember their mothers’ and grandmothers’ struggles for equal rights.
Was it a struggle to put a woman in the White House or a struggle for the right to CHOOSE whom to vote for, what team to play on, what job to go after (and not least of all, whether to continue a pregnancy)? It was not a struggle to saddle our children with our choices. See the difference?
This morning I had a great conversation with a local woman, Ellie Anbinder, who has a long personal history of entrepreneurship, supporting other women, and struggling through the Dark Ages when, for instance, a banker told her that her business plan was not eligible for a loan because her husband wasn’t there to sign it for her.
Ellie said she doesn’t think young women should be obligated to vote for Hillary Clinton, but that all subsequent generations should have an understanding of what women went through in the 1960s and 1970s to get where we are today. She had few career choices (she went to college to be a teacher although it wasn’t what she really wanted to do), but now women are leaders in many industries.
We share the concern that the efforts of the women’s movement will be forgotten. That way, it will be easier to get future generations back into the “box” of limited education, limited opportunities and – to put it bluntly – back under control.

I’ve struggled with the choice among the presidential candidates myself. I’ve wondered whether I have an obligation to support Hillary Clinton. And I think it’s OK if that support is simply in the form of demanding factual, unbiased coverage of her campaign.
And perhaps we should lobby to make August 26 a national holiday to remind women that it’s the anniversary of our right to vote (granted in 1920, long after many other countries). Just as a reminder.
| nikki | Hillary
Posted Wed, 05/14/2008 - 19:41
I don't think young women should feel obligated to vote for Hillary...one of my daughters is pro-Hillary, the other for Obama. But for me this campaign will forever be tainted by anti-woman bias and the evidence that there's still a deep vein of mysogyny running through our culture. I will never regain the initial excitement of having two great candidates running because the national media and pompous pundits like Chris Matthews have ruined it for me. I feel especially sad when I see someone like Maureen Dowd viciously attacking Hillary in print day after day. If women don't want to vote for her, that's one thing, but the venom of the attacks is incomprehensible to me. I'm voting for her because I admire her strength and her tenaciousness, and yes, of course, I want to see a woman in the White House just as much as African Americans long to see Obama there. I will vote this year for the Democratic candidate whoever it may be, but there won't be much joy in it.
~nikki
|
| Aleigh | I agree with Nikki.
Posted Thu, 05/15/2008 - 08:42
Especially because this is the first presidential election when my mom and I have actually AGREED on a candidate. I'm not sure if that will ever happen again.
If I have to vote for Obama, I suppose I will. But I'll do it reluctantly, because I find myself even more disillusioned this year with our two-party system.
Love your idea for a new national holiday, though! Votes for Women! My favorite part of Mary Poppins was always when Mrs. Banks sang "Sister Suffragettes."
|